communityfix.org

#agriculture

Issues, solutions, and case studies for agriculture

Found 30 nodes with this tag: 4 issues · 4 solutions · 22 case studies

Issues 4

#00141Utility-scale solar competes for land with farming, habitat, and communities, slowing deployment

Utility-scale solar needs roughly 5–7 acres per MW, putting large arrays in direct competition with farmland, habitat, and communities. Local siting conflict and permitting friction — not raw land scarcity — are what throttle deployment speed.

#00041The livelihood gap: enforcement without economic alternatives for miners, smallholders and forest communities

Enforcement reaches the act of clearing but not the economics behind it. Illegal miners and smallholders often clear because it is their only livelihood, so crackdowns without alternatives push activity underground and cause hardship rather than keeping forest standing.

national

#00039Leakage: protecting one biome or commodity displaces clearing to less-protected savannas and dry forests

Protecting one biome or commodity can just displace clearing to the next. The Amazon Soy Moratorium shielded rainforest but pushed soy and pasture into the less-protected Cerrado savanna, now often the hardest-hit biome. Savannas and dry forests get weaker legal protection.

national

#00038Cattle ranching as the dominant deforestation driver, and the cattle-laundering loophole

Cattle ranching is the top driver of Amazon clearing and is uniquely hard to govern: animals raised on illegally cleared land are laundered through clean intermediary ranches before sale, defeating checks that verify only the direct supplier. The gap is indirect traceability.

national

Solutions 4

#00116Prioritise assisted natural regeneration and protecting standing forest over transplanting nursery seedlings

Where land was recently forested, protect and prune regrowth from surviving roots and seed banks (assisted/farmer-managed natural regeneration) rather than transplanting nursery seedlings — far cheaper, with site-adapted species. Intact standing forest should take priority, as it

#00037Whole-of-government coordination plan (PPCDAm) backed by a performance-based international fund (Amazon Fund)

Bind the measures with a standing interministerial action plan (PPCDAm) covering land-use planning, monitoring and sustainable production, funded by a performance-based mechanism (the Amazon Fund) that pays out only after verified reductions and draws sustained donor finance.

national

#00036Cut off the money: supply-chain zero-deforestation agreements, conditional credit, and municipal blacklisting

Attack the economics, not just the act: zero-deforestation buyer agreements (Soy Moratorium, G4 cattle deal), rural credit conditioned on compliance, a property registry (CAR), and blacklisting the worst-offending municipalities so cleared land loses market and credit access.

national

#00031Subsidised laying-hen distribution: give households hens that eat food scraps on site

A municipality buys laying hens from regional breeders and gives them free or subsidised to registered households with gardens. The hens eat kitchen scraps, diverting biowaste at source, and give eggs in return. Run as a complement to curbside collection, not a replacement.

region

Case studies 22

BNDES (Brazilian Development Bank), with donors Norway (NICFI), Germany (KfW/BMZ), UK, US, Switzerland, Japan, Denmark, and Petrobras · since 2008 · National

The Amazon Fund is a performance-based forest finance mechanism created in 2008 and managed by Brazil's development bank BNDES. It disburses money only after INPE verifies that deforestation has fallen below a baseline,…

Approximate fund size (2024)~1.3USD bn
Norway cumulative contribution (historical)>1.2USD bn

Norway (NICFI), Germany (KfW/BMZ), UK, US, Switzerland, Japan, Denmark, Petrobras — performance-based transfers contingent on verified deforestation reductions · 2 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

Communauté de communes du Sud Territoire (CCST) · 2013–2016 · City

Hens per household2hens
Years run2013-2016period

1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

Syndicat mixte Trigone (Gers) · since 2014 · Region

Test households (applicants)~80households
Hens per household2hens

1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

Commune de Lisses, with Siredom · since 2016 · City

Households served per year100households
Hens distributed per year200hens

1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

Municipality of Etterbeek (with Bruxelles-Environnement) · since 2014 · Neighborhood

Participating households~20households
Year started2014year

1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

City of Mouscron · since 2010 · Neighborhood

Pairs of hens distributed (per round)50pairs
Year of first round2010year

2 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

Town of Diest · City

Participating families~2000families
Hens per family3hens

1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

Communauté de communes du Pays Haut Val d'Alzette (CCPHVA) · since 2014 · City

Test hens40hens
Biowaste consumed (3-month operation, 40 hens)255kg

1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

SYBERT (Syndicat mixte de Besançon et de sa région) · since 2014 · City

Test households16households
Applications received200households

1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

Communauté d'agglomération de Mantes-en-Yvelines (CAMY) · 2015–2016 · City

Test households59households
Waste diverted October 2015 (59 households)633.78kg

CAMY Local Waste Reduction Programme (Programme Local de Prévention des Déchets) · 1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

Commune de Pincé · 2012 · Neighborhood

Households participating31households
Hens per household2hens

1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

Commune de Barsac / CC de Podensac; ValOrizon (Lot-et-Garonne waste authority) · since 2017 · Region

Hens distributed (Barsac)1000hens
Bulk purchase cost (Barsac, 1000 hens)8500EUR

2 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

SIRMOTOM (inter-municipal waste authority, Montereau area) · 2013–2014 · City

Test households40households
Hens per household2hens

SIRMOTOM local waste-prevention programme · 1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

SMITOM du Santerre · 2014–2017 · Region

Hens distributed 2014 (8 communes)~300hens
Hens distributed 2015 (65 communes)~1900hens

SMITOM du Santerre and member communautés de communes; ADEME-backed waste-prevention programme (2011–2016) · 2 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

Trivalis (Syndicat mixte départemental, Vendée) · 2013–2014 · Region

Pilot households (2013)37households
Households served (2014 rollout)~600households

Trivalis (Vendée departmental waste authority) and member local authorities · 2 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

City of Antwerp (environmental department) · City

Households participating1000+households
Average waste reduction per household (reported)~50kg/year

2 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

Municipality of Opwijk / INZET · 2018 · Neighborhood

Households served30households
Hens distributed60hens

1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

Limburg.net (inter-municipal waste authority, Province of Limburg + Diest) · Region

Families adopting hens in one year (reported)2500+families
Waste processed per hen (authority guidance)up to 50kg/year

3 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

SICTOM Nord Allier · 2013–2015 · City

Test households20households
Applications received100+households

SICTOM Nord Allier local waste-prevention programme · 1 source

Arnaud Gissinger

SIMER (Syndicat Interdépartemental Mixte pour l'Équipement Rural) · 2014–2015 · Region

Households applied922households
Hens distributed (2014-2015)~800hens

SIMER local waste-prevention programme, supported by ADEME · 2 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

Territoire de la Côte Ouest (TCO) · 2017–2018 · City

Households applied123households
Monitored test households~20households

2 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

Colmar Agglomération · since 2014 · Region

Hens distributed (2025 edition)840hens
Households served (2025 edition)420households

€25 · Colmar Agglomération and its member communes (local household-waste prevention plan); ADEME subsidises the communication component · 5 sources

Arnaud Gissinger

communityfix.org