communityfix.org

Case study of

#00031 Subsidised laying-hen distribution: give households hens that eat food scraps on site

Besançon area (SYBERT), Doubs, France

#00031

PartialCity

Implementer

SYBERT (Syndicat mixte de Besançon et de sa région)

Timeline

Since Jan 1, 2014

Location

Besançon area (SYBERT), Doubs, France47.2378, 6.0244

Description

What was done

The SYBERT (the waste authority for the Besançon area, Doubs, France) ran "Des poules pour réduire mes déchets" as a deliberately communication-focused test-household action. It selected 16 test households (from 200 applicants), including one Besançon-based association running a midday catering service, and monitored the food waste they diverted to hens over a 3-month experiment.

The framing was distinctive: the SYBERT designed the action primarily to communicate broadly about waste prevention — "everyone has their own method to reduce waste" — and partnered with a well-known local comedian (the character "la Madeleine Proust") to carry the message. The authority cited an IPSOS survey showing animal-feeding was already a non-negligible waste-reduction practice locally (~12% of households).

Results

  • 0.36 tonnes of food waste diverted to animal feeding over the 3-month experiment across the 16 households (composted waste not counted).
  • 200 applications for 16 places.

What a replicating authority should know

  • A hen action can be run primarily as a communication vehicle. The SYBERT's main aim was visibility for waste prevention generally — the 16 households were the hook, not the mechanism. If the goal is awareness rather than tonnage, design accordingly and keep the pilot small.
  • A local celebrity partner amplifies reach. Partnering with a recognised regional comedian gave the message cut-through it would not have had from the authority alone.
  • Survey first to position the message. The SYBERT used an IPSOS survey showing ~12% already feed animals to frame hens as a normal, established practice rather than a novelty.
  • Small short pilots yield small numbers. 0.36 t over 3 months from 16 households is modest — appropriate for a communication pilot, but not a basis for territory-wide diversion claims.

Honest reading

Outcome recorded as partial: the action succeeded on its own communication-focused terms and produced a clean measured figure, but the diverted tonnage is small and the pilot was short, so it does not by itself demonstrate large-scale waste impact.

Metrics

4
Test households16households
Applications received200households
Waste diverted (3-month experiment)0.36tonnes
Experiment duration3months

Lessons learned

  • A hen action can be run primarily as a communication vehicle: the SYBERT's main aim was broad visibility for waste prevention, with 16 households as the hook rather than the mechanism.
  • A local celebrity partner amplifies reach - partnering with a recognised regional comedian gave the message cut-through the authority alone would not have had.
  • Survey first to position the message: the SYBERT used an IPSOS finding (~12% already feed animals) to frame hens as an established practice, not a novelty.
  • Small short pilots yield small numbers (0.36 t over 3 months from 16 households) - appropriate for a communication pilot but not a basis for territory-wide diversion claims.

Documented May 26, 2026

Author AvatarArnaud Gissinger

communityfix.org