communityfix.org

#data-centre-water-consumption

Issues, solutions, and case studies for data-centre-water-consumption

Issues 2

#00210Siting deals are negotiated under non-disclosure agreements and operating data is withheld, so communities cannot evaluate the trade

Around 80% of Virginia localities with data-center activity have NDAs in place. Where reporting is mandatory it is widely ignored: the EU database's first cycle saw 36% participation with no consequences for the rest.

#00207data-center cooling and its electricity supply draw freshwater from basins that are already stressed

Evaporative cooling consumes 1 to 9 litres per kWh on site, and the electricity behind it carries roughly ten times more embedded water. National totals look trivial while single cities reach 40% of municipal use, so the harm is basin-scale and invisible in aggregate.

Solutions 3

#00223Mandate per-facility energy and water reporting with a penalty attached, and bar NDAs covering utility impacts

Require each facility above a size threshold to report metered energy, water withdrawal and consumption to a public register, with a real penalty for non-reporting, and prohibit local NDAs that cover utility impacts. The EU tried this without penalties and got 36% participation.

national

#00219Make reclaimed or non-potable water the default permitted supply for cooling

Condition data-centre cooling permits on treated municipal effluent, brackish groundwater, or industrial process water by default, with potable connection allowed only by explicit exception. Microsoft's San Antonio site reports 79% of consumption from recycled or non-potable sour

city

#00218Build closed-loop cooling with no evaporative make-up, and publish the energy penalty it costs

Fill the cooling loop once and reject heat mechanically instead of by evaporation, eliminating ongoing water draw. Microsoft claims this avoids over 125 million litres per facility per year. The trade is electricity, and no operator has published the PUE penalty.

Case studies 4

City of The Dalles and Google, opposed by The Oregonian / Oregon Live · 2021–2022 · City

A public records case documenting the cost of obtaining basic operating data without a mandatory register. The city of The Dalles litigated for 13 months to block a newspaper's public records request for Google's water…

Duration of litigation to block disclosure13months
Company contribution to the city's litigation costs>100,000USD

City of The Dalles, with over $100,000 contributed by Google toward the litigation · 2 sources

Gerard Antoun

European Commission, with EU member state authorities; independent analysis by the Green Web Foundation · since 2024 · Region

The first mandatory facility-level sustainability reporting regime for data-centers, established under the recast EU Energy Efficiency Directive, with its first reporting cycle in 2024. Participation was 36% despite the…

Participation rate, first cycle100% required36%
Ireland participation~17%

European Union · 1 source

Gerard Antoun

Microsoft · since 2024 · City

Microsoft announced its closed-loop, zero-water-evaporation datacentre design in December 2024, naming Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin and Phoenix, Arizona as the first sites, with further builds coming online from late 2027.…

Claimed water avoided per facility>125,000,000litres per year
Microsoft fleet WUE0.27 (FY2025)L/kWh

Microsoft · 3 sources

Gerard Antoun

Google, with Uruguay's Ministry of Environment · 2023–2024 · City

Google's original Canelones facility design required approximately 7.6 million litres of potable water per day for evaporative cooling. During Uruguay's 2023 drought, Montevideo's utility blended brackish estuary water…

Potable water draw in original design7600000litres per day
Potable water draw in approved air-cooled design76000000litres per day

2 sources

Gerard Antoun

communityfix.org