communityfix.org

Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, USA (Microsoft zero-water evaporation pilot)

#00228

OngoingCity

Case study of

#00218 Build closed-loop cooling with no evaporative make-up, and publish the energy penalty it costs

Implementer

Microsoft

Timeline

Since Dec 9, 2024

Location

Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, USA (Microsoft zero-water evaporation pilot)42.7192, -87.8543

Description

Microsoft announced its closed-loop, zero-water-evaporation datacentre design in December 2024, naming Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin and Phoenix, Arizona as the first sites, with further builds coming online from late 2027. Two findings complicate the headline. First, the energy trade is acknowledged but unquantified: Microsoft's announcement concedes that removing evaporative cooling increases PUE, mitigated by high-efficiency economising chillers at elevated water temperatures, but no PUE figure has been published for these sites. Because US grid electricity carries roughly ten times more embedded water at the generating station than the cooling water saved on site, the net water effect cannot be evaluated externally. Second, the Mount Pleasant site required manual fan adjustments and added sound-reduction components after tonal humming complaints from residents. Removing evaporative cooling shifts thermal duty onto mechanical equipment, which produces the tonal noise at issue. The water fix and the noise fix are coupled and must be designed together.

Metrics

2
Claimed water avoided per facility>125,000,000litres per year
Microsoft fleet WUE0.27 (FY2025)L/kWh

Funding

Microsoft

Lessons learned

  • Solving water can worsen noise: mechanical cooling replaces evaporation with fans and chillers, and this site needed acoustic remediation after commissioning. Treat waterless cooling and acoustic design as one problem, not two.
  • The energy penalty of waterless cooling remains unpublished. Communities and regulators should require a measured PUE and WUE pair as a permit condition rather than accepting a qualitative 'nominal increase'.
  • Facility-level zero-water claims and fleet-level absolute consumption are different statements. A falling WUE ratio alongside undisclosed total consumption cannot be checked against basin-level water impact.

Documented Jul 28, 2026

Author AvatarGerard Antoun

communityfix.org