#00075
Discarded packaging, cigarette butts and other small waste builds up along roadsides, trails, parks, rivers, beaches and the ocean — harming wildlife, degrading shared spaces, and costing the public hundreds of millions a year to clean up.
Reframe not-littering as an expression of who people already are — local pride, group identity — rather than an environmental instruction. Aimed at the demographics most likely to litter and delivered through broadcast and social media at scale.
Shape the cues that drive littering: keep spaces visibly clean (a clean place signals 'nobody litters here'), and pair 'most people don't litter' (descriptive) with 'littering is not OK' (injunctive) messages, which together change behaviour more than either alone.
A fixed, on-the-spot financial penalty raises the expected cost of littering. Consistency and visible enforcement matter more than fine size — a high penalty that is never issued deters nobody. Works as a backstop alongside infrastructure and behaviour-change measures, not as a s
Redesign bins to capture more litter: make disposal a small game or 'vote', place and size them where litter actually occurs, and use fill-sensors so they don't overflow. Turning the right choice into the fun, convenient choice measurably cuts nearby litter.
Organise volunteers to remove litter at scale — through recurring community cleanups, fitness-linked litter-picking (plogging), and 'adopt a stretch' stewardship. Removes existing harm, builds an engaged constituency, and can feed monitoring data.