#00083
Shape the cues that drive littering: keep spaces visibly clean (a clean place signals 'nobody litters here'), and pair 'most people don't litter' (descriptive) with 'littering is not OK' (injunctive) messages, which together change behaviour more than either alone.
Parent issue
#00075 Litter accumulating in natural and public spaces
Location
Description
Littering is strongly cued by context. People litter more in already-littered places and when they see others litter (a descriptive norm that "this is what people do here"), and less in conspicuously clean spaces. Messaging works best when it pairs a descriptive norm ("most people dispose of their litter properly") with an injunctive norm ("littering here is not acceptable"); combined, they reinforce each other and avoid the boomerang effect a descriptive norm alone can trigger. Related cues — even printed "watching eyes" above a message — measurably increase compliance.
A cross-cutting, low-cost lever applicable to any setting, and a natural complement to keeping hotspots clean — rapid removal both fixes the harm and resets the norm.
Effects are real but modest and context-dependent; the strongest, most replicable finding is simply that clean environments stay cleaner, so keeping a space spotless is itself an intervention. Field evidence comes largely from controlled experiments, and durability at municipal scale is less well established.
Links
2Sub-issues
0Case studies
0