communityfix.org

Case study of

#00083 Social-norm messaging and management of environmental cues

Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona, USA

#00112

FailedRegion

Implementer

Cialdini et al. (field experiment), Petrified Forest National Park

Location

Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona, USA34.9099, -109.8068

Description

A controlled field experiment by Cialdini and colleagues at Petrified Forest National Park tested anti-theft signage on visitor paths where marked pieces of petrified wood were placed. A sign stressing a negative descriptive norm — that many past visitors had removed wood — increased theft relative to no sign. A prohibitive sign stating the injunctive norm ('Please don't remove the petrified wood…') produced the lowest theft rate. This demonstrates the same norm-messaging lever backfiring when it broadcasts how common the undesirable behaviour is.

Metrics

2
Theft of marked wood — 'theft is common' (negative descriptive norm) sign2.927.92% of marked pieces stolen
Theft of marked wood — prohibitive 'please don't' (injunctive norm) sign1.67% of marked pieces stolen

Lessons learned

  • A message that emphasises how many people currently litter or steal can backfire by normalising it — the 'many visitors take wood' sign nearly tripled theft (7.92%) versus the no-sign control (2.92%).
  • Effective cue management states the injunctive norm (what one should do) rather than broadcasting a negative descriptive norm (what many people actually do) — the injunctive sign reduced theft to 1.67%.
  • Framing, not just the channel, determines the outcome: the same norm-messaging lever produced opposite results depending on whether it highlighted common bad behaviour or prohibited it.

Documented Jun 27, 2026

Author AvatarArnaud Gissinger

communityfix.org