communityfix.org

Case study of

#00137 Guarantee the market: pooled procurement, subsidy, prequalification and regional manufacturing

Sub-Saharan Africa

#00136

FailedRegion

Implementer

Sanofi Pasteur (manufacturer)

Timeline

Until Jun 30, 2016

Location

Sub-Saharan Africa6.6111, 20.9394

Description

FAV-Afrique was a polyvalent antivenom covering ~10 snake species across sub-Saharan Africa, considered safe and effective. Sanofi Pasteur halted production in 2010 (last batch made 2014, expired June 2016) after sales collapsed — undercut by cheaper competitors — with no technical failure. The ~2-year replacement gap was filled by cheaper antivenoms raised against non-African snakes, often ineffective. This case illustrates the specific market failure that pooled procurement, subsidy, and guaranteed volumes are designed to prevent: the product and know-how existed, but the unsubsidised market could not sustain commercial viability.

Metrics

4
Price per dose>US$100USD
Annual sales vs. disease burden by 2010fell to under 1% of burden (~3,000 cases treated)
Replacement gap after last batch expired~2 years with no equivalent product available
Snake species covered by FAV-Afrique~10species

Funding

$100

Lessons learned

  • A quality product was withdrawn solely because unsubsidised demand collapsed — demonstrating that guaranteed procurement and subsidy are necessary conditions, not optional enhancements, for sustaining region-matched antivenom supply.
  • The withdrawal created a vacuum filled by cheaper, inappropriate antivenoms raised against non-African snakes, compounding clinical harm and eroding clinician trust in antivenom generally.
  • Dependence on a single commercial manufacturer for an entire region is a structural risk; regional manufacturing diversity and pooled procurement would reduce exposure to a single firm's exit decision.

Documented Jul 8, 2026

Author AvatarArnaud Gissinger

History

· 1
Createdapproved

Arnaud Gissinger · 1h ago · approved by Arnaud Gissinger 1h ago


communityfix.org